Where Did Our Rivalry Go?

By: Ian | June 16th, 2008

A three-nil drubbing at the hands of your most despised enemy is enough to put any fan in a mood so sour that puppies and songbirds seem like good targets for a well-placed kick.  So bear with me if my vision is clouded by Saturday’s events.  It seems that Quakes fans everywhere, myself included, are consumed by a burning rage and discontent right now.  Certainly part of it can be attributed to losing at “home” to the Scum, especially when we have grown accustomed to a recent history of humiliating our foes in the most satisfying ways (2001 cup, 2003 play-offs, 2005 regular season, etc.).  Then again, we certainly endured a painful loss to the Galaxy at home at the end of 2005, the same defeat that sent us off into oblivion.  So I feel there is something more going on here than a simple loss to our rivals.

I feel the source of our discontent is an anxiety that perhaps the rivalry itself is being undermined and is in jeopardy.  Certainly not for the die-hard Quakes (and L.A.) supporters, but part of what made the rivalry so special in the past is the way in which it was able to weave a spell over all those who came into its web, whoever they might be.  The return of Judas match in 2005 was filled with tension and passion, not just from the supporter’s groups, but from every square inch of Spartan stadium.  The famous miracle comeback in 2003 had every last member of that crowd jumping and screaming by the end of it.  Given this rich history, so much of what I witnessed and experienced on Saturday just felt wrong

 Much has been made of the Beckham effect, namely the throngs of curiosity seekers and young girls attracted to Mr. Posh wherever the Galaxy touch down.  What most in the media have failed to take into account (or don’t really care enough to find out, I’m looking at you Merc), is that while this is fine, albeit annoying, in Chicago or D.C. or anywhere else in the league, it is absolutely damaging in the Bay Area.  Part of what is so invigorating about the rivalry, as I mentioned, is the way in which it joins every person in the stands (minus the traveling Galaxy fans) into one united entity willing our collective champions to victory.  When this is taken away, and L.A. goals are greeted in our supposed “home” by deafening cheers, it rips at the soul of our rivalry and the hearts of Quakes fans.  I went down to L.A. for the opening game of the season, and I have to say, the experience was not that far removed away from the match in Oakland two nights ago.  In both cases, being in the heart of the supporter’s groups felt like a case of us against the world. 

Is this all an overreaction?  Maybe.  But part of what Quakes fans are going through this season is the realization that we must win back everything we had before.  I don’t think any of us expected a championship team again right from the start, but some of the things we did believe we could have right now haven’t come to fruition either.  Namely, a squad of guys, no matter how untalented or inexperienced, who would leave every last piece of themselves out there on the field against our most hated rivals.  The problem is our players out there, for the most part, don’t hate L.A.  I think it was a strategic mistake on Yallop’s part to play down the rivalry, even though I applauded his decision at first.  Make your team understand the history of the match-up, make them understand how important it is to the fans, make them understand their responsibility.  Yes, that’s a lot of pressure, but at least you make the stakes clear.  We’re not asking for victory necessarily or even a beautiful game.  Just get out there and fight your hardest, and maybe we won’t be happy, but at least those wounds will only be of the flesh, able to be mended by the sweat of those who play for us.

 At the end of the day, Quakes fans felt persecuted in their own home, betrayed by their own players (rightly or wrongly), and worried that perhaps San Jose may become irrelevant to L.A.  Yes, I said it.  After two years absence, what if things have changed and that rivalry can never be recaptured?  Those are the stakes for us fans.  Only if you understand that can you understand the reaction from Quakes’ fans, the deep bitterness so evident in the past few days.  At times, perhaps Quakes fans have come off as being “ungrateful” or too quick to complain about every little thing, especially after we were fortunate enough to get our team back.  However, in the end, if nothing else, we only ask one thing from the front office, from Lew Wolff, from anyone else in charge.  Don’t give us back a body with no soul.  We need this rivalry.  It is part of our identity and enriches the entire league immeasurably.  If that means changing the venue to preserve the spirit, make it so.  If that means losing out on some revenue, so be it.  I know that’s not the logic that will win out in the real world, but I’ll tell you this.  A vibrant Quakes-Galaxy rivalry, the kind that creates memories that will last a lifetime and stories that blend into dreams, will ultimately do more to bring in committed, long-term soccer fans than a legion of Beckhams.

End rant. 





Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Where Did Our Rivalry Go? digg:Where Did Our Rivalry Go? reddit:Where Did Our Rivalry Go? fark:Where Did Our Rivalry Go? Y!:Where Did Our Rivalry Go? stumbleupon:Where Did Our Rivalry Go?

Comments   |  Add your comment

  • Diane |  June 17th, 2008 at 7:37 am

    cornercorner

    Ian, it will work out fine in the end even if it makes your skin crawl at the moment. Earthquake fans and/or curiosity seekers aren’t going over to the dark side, they’re just showing appreciation for some nice work–past or present. It happens in much more historic rivalries than this. Yeah, there are some swoony fans, so what, most SJ faithful, and certainly the players, will only be more fired up against the Galaxy after Saturday night.

    Players don’t need to hate their rivals, they need to hate losing and then just hate losing to their rivals more.

    We don’t have a situation in the U.S. where players (or coaches) risk their lives, or their only means of livelihood, if they don’t perform. So that extra edge of passion isn’t ingrained. But competition is. There’s not much MLS can do to raise the stakes at this point, but they can move the nature of the game here a little closer to what you (and I) would like to see by raising the level of competition.

    Obviously Beckham helps do that, but he does one more thing you didn’t list that might be even more important here in the long run. He illustrates why its (almost) as much fun to watch what goes on in the middle of the pitch as it is to see a goal scored. And that a great build-up to a goal is better yet. Among the many MLS players that do this brilliantly, since he’s being watched more its lucky that his ability to make a bit of time and space enables the uninitiated to see what he does more clearly.

    I’ve been surprised at how quickly general commentary, press reports, and non-fan chatter, have changed in this last year to include parts of the game that (more) people used to refer to as nap time…or just didn’t appreciate. More educated fans are always a good thing.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Diane |  June 17th, 2008 at 8:00 am

    cornercorner

    p.s. No issue with your expectation that management should be doing their part to keep things hot between the teams.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Kyle |  June 17th, 2008 at 2:22 pm

    cornercorner

    Hate to say it, but the Beckham thing hasn’t done anything to diminish the Galaxy-Chivas thing. I think sharing the same stadium might be a little more irritating to LA fans than the same state.

    On the other hand, trying to analyze the mind of a Galaxy fan is probably a pointless activity.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Ian |  June 17th, 2008 at 9:41 pm

    cornercorner

    Thanks for the comments both of you.

    Diane: I know, in the end it will probably turn out fine. Beckham will be gone in a few years, and the rivalry will have had time to build back up. But in the moment, it all just feels so wrong.

    Kyle: Yeah, I was wondering about the Chivas-Galaxy rivalry when I wrote this, and I figured that it wouldn’t have the same effect since you share the same city, same stadium, and the rivalry is in its beginning stages, still finding its identity and character.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Ian |  June 17th, 2008 at 9:43 pm

    cornercorner

    Oh one last thing, don’t get me wrong, I’m glad Beckham is in the league. It has increased the profile of soccer in the country, etc., etc. Plus, it gives me another villain to hate! I just don’t want the league to forget the really fundamental things that attract fans in their pursuit of superstar names.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Melissa |  June 17th, 2008 at 10:35 pm

    cornercorner

    Ok, I think the rivalry is pretty much dead. The league kind of moved on in SJ’s absence. Yeah, it sucks but there you go. BUT I’m pretty impressed with Doyle’s attempts to reestablish local ties here. He seems to be on track to picking players and staff who ether have a history with the Quakes or a history in the area. These are all good things to help rekindle a regional loyalty. So the Quakes start out with the expansion picks. But slowly they bring in, for example, Adam Smarte (UCSC, SJ Frogs), Dan Benton (SJ State, SF Seals), Jamil Roberts (Santa Clara), etc etc etc. I think Joe Cannon counted something like six former Santa Clara guys in training on one of his blogs (including himself). I’m too lazy right now to look back and confirm the number he quoted to be honest.

    And, ok. Apparently you guys don’t like the Oakland Coliseum. Fine. It’s temporary. The uniforms don’t say Oakland on them. As long as everything is on track to get the SSS at the old FMC site, then the club stays put and the (new) owners remain supportive. Unforch, you’ve got to give this a bit more time. I fully expect the Quakes to rebuild back to their former glory (since they’ve been around in one form or another since the invention of the wheel in this country I suppose).

    I probably have more to say on this topic but I’m losing my concentration. I blame Mtv.

    EDIT: Dyslexia strikes again. Dan Benton is the goalkeeper. Eric Denton is the defender. Grrrrrrr.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Alexi |  June 18th, 2008 at 8:15 am

    cornercorner

    Quakes need to beat the crap out of Galaxy on the field to restore the rivalry. Probably, won’t happen until the next season, though.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Diane |  June 18th, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    cornercorner

    I get your frustration, Ian. You almost have to keep one eye and both ears closed to keep the business from ruining whatever sport you follow. It drives me nuts. Hopefully if the league at least makes sure the stars they recruit can play and are committed [and pays all players a living wage!] there’s a chance that focus will remain on the game each time the dust settles.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner

Leave a Reply

If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse our
Commenting Guidelines.


USA National Team News

Tickets to upcoming games


Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners



Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email sanjose[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives